The East Sea Dragon Palace, also known as the East Sea Dragon Empire, are, as a Zun Level organization, one of the pinnacle strength factions of the Gan Yu region of the Nine Clouds Continent. It had three empires of lower quality under its jurisdiction and those empires had many countries under their control. The East Sea Empire was extremely powerful. As such, they were able to benefit from Great Competition of Xue Yu, gaining Duan Wu Ya as a disciple, and participate in the Exploration of the Jade Emperor's Tomb. When Lin Feng killed Duan Wu Ya on their doorstep, they chased Lin Feng to Death Valley, but ultimately ended up giving up rather than risking their own destruction.
Martial Empires
Elkins takes readers on a world tour of British atrocities. The set pieces of modern British imperial scandal are all here. She explores the invention of concentration camps in 1900 during the Boer War, when the British herded about 200,000 Black Africans and Afrikaners, including thousands of noncombatants, into murderous camps in what is now South Africa. The years that followed saw brutal acts of reprisal in Ireland. The 1916 Easter Rising was met with stiff repression: British forces operating under martial law executed 15 Irishmen by firing squad and interned at least 1,500 civilians. Also covered is the massacre at the Indian city of Amritsar in 1919, when British forces fired on unarmed civilian protesters, killing at least 400 and wounding some 1,500. Around the same time, the British were refining violent police tactics in Palestine, leading to the full-scale suppression of the Arab revolt of the 1930s. Techniques honed around the empire were then brought to bear with devastating effect in the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya during the 1950s, when the British clamped down on the movement with a ruthless campaign of arrests, detention, and torture. Imperial authorities killed, maimed, or tortured about 90,000 Kenyans and drove some 160,000 into concentration camps.
The 2012 decision of the court in favor of the plaintiffs in the Mau Mau case marks a rare moment in the book when British law operates as something other than a cover for violent state repression. The book emphasizes the way the law functioned to legitimize imperial power. Repeatedly, Elkins illustrates, martial law and other emergency measures allowed for the suspension of fundamental protections, such as the writ of habeas corpus, for imperial subjects.
Other historians, including several Elkins cites, have previously traced the way martial law opened the floodgates of violent repression in the British Empire. Yet these histories have also revealed that declarations of martial law prompted extensive debates about the imperial constitution. Critics of empire repeatedly urged restrictions on how the law could be used to advance the interests of colonial elites and unleash arbitrary power. Elkins pushes aside this well-documented history of controversy about law and justice in the empire in favor of a simplistic account of the periodic suspension of rights.
Elkins is forced to veer from a straightforward story of liberal complicity in imperial violence when she traces debates about the constitutionality of repression in Jamaica following the Morant Bay revolt in 1865. Governor Edward Eyre ordered the arrest of George William Gordon, a prominent critic of the colonial government. Gordon was apprehended in a part of the island that was not under martial law and then transported to Morant Bay, where he was tried by a military court, convicted, and hanged. In London, John Stuart Mill and other liberals struggled to reconcile the unequal and uneven justice of the empire with their vision of a government dedicated to the protection of all its citizens and subjects. Elkins pauses here to observe the tensions between liberalism and imperialism.
Official violence in the British Empire deserves close study, and Elkins makes an important contribution to exposing its hidden history. Yet the lens of liberal imperialism can also be distorting. As Germany showed in the 1940s and as Russia demonstrates again today, aspiring empires may embrace the worst kinds of violence without any pretense of commitment to the rule of law. Liberal visions of empire both cultivated and critiqued imperial violence. They do not hold a unique key to understanding state-directed atrocities.
By the time Stewart returned to Washington in 1824, he faced a court-martial and four charges: unofficerlike conduct, disobedience of orders, neglect of duty, and oppression and cruelty. The decision to court-martial Stewart was based on complaints by one of the new South American governments: in his absence, the rebel Peruvian government had made official complaints against him for his actions as squadron commodore, and this complaint had been seconded by U.S. consular officials.2
The nature of the second charge of disobedience of orders (which had seven specifications) was that Stewart had knowingly and willfully received on board the Franklin a spy in the royalist army from Peru. Of all the charges this was perhaps the most serious, and much of the court-martial centered on its intricacies.
Book Reviews, 32:2, 1988 fantasy. But Eby, carried away by biography, devotes much space to Barrie's well-known obsessions with young boys, the precise connection with martial spirit seemingly lost. In a chapter on Kipling, the martial spirit is fully operative, and Eby employs biography and critical analysis in an illuminating manner. But in a chapter involving A. Conan Doyle, he begins with four and a half pages on Sherlock Holmes, whose relevance to the "jingoist scaremongering associated with the 1890s," except for one possible tale, is not immediately apparent. Eby, however , moves into Doyle's writings on the Boer War (for which he was knighted) and his later fiction, including his final Holmes story in 1917, "a spy story in the worn groove of William Le Queux." Despite occasional wanderings (again, in the chapter on Rupert Brooke, miscellaneous biography goes on for many pages before the martial spirit emerges), Eby's amusing study illuminates a cultural angst of the transitional period intensified by the wave of literacy initiated by the Elementary Education Act of 1870, which established free secular schools. The result was an unprecedented number of magazines, newspapers, and books that were churned out to meet the new demand for entertainment, much of it jingoist. Karl Beckson __________________________________Brooklyn College, CUNY______________ LITERATURE OF EMPIRE D. C. R. A. Goonetilleke. Images of the Raj: South Asia in the Literature of Empire. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988. $29.95 Professor Goonetilleke, who teaches at the University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, has written a short but useful book about the fiction of Rudyard Kipling, Leonard Woolf, E. M. Forster, George Orwell, and Paul Scott. Although the subtitle speaks of South Asia, considerations are largely focused on limited areas of India, Sri Lanka, and Burma. Even Kipling, the writer most often identified with a sense of India as a cultural entity, wrote only about the northern sectors and knew very little about, and never paid much attention to, South India, which in itself is a subcontinent. South Asia is simply too vast to be generalized about, either by Asians or by English novelists. An intense anger underlies Goonetilleke's concept of imperialism; it comes very close to the surface in such remarks as "Self-interested economic motives form the primary factor in imperialism, while selfinterested political considerations are the secondary factor" (5); and it damages his assessments of creative achievement. A reader would never gather from either the first chapter, "Early Responses," or the 214 Book Reviews, 32:2, 1988 last, "Beyond Stereotypes," that historians of the last half-century have been amassing a formidable amount of statistical evidence that documents the economic damage imposed on English commercial, social, and political structures by imperial responsibilities (expenditures for the Army and Navy, protection for English civilians, the expense of educational facilities, the building of railroads, the training of a civil service, etc.). Whether this money was well-spent or not is a matter for debate, and Goonetilleke may reasonably argue that it did not compensate for moral damage inflicted on native populations. Nevertheless, the budgets of the Chancellor for the Exchequer from the turn of the century were never realistic about the increasingly heavy costs of Empire. In Micawber's famous formulation, expenditures exceeded income long before World War II cancelled the notion of a permanent Empire covering one-third of the earth's land. (The Empire reached its maximum extent in 1921, by the way.) The days of the Raj were doomed fully as much by the fact that the British Empire did not pay its way as by the unrest and resistance of native populations. Much the same may be said about other empires constructed hastily during the nineteenth century; relatively little remains of the dynastic flags planted in Africa between 1870 and 1910; and Images of the Raj would benefit from fuller recognition of the quarrel among historians as to the true nature of imperialism, who gained and who lost from its existence, and which of Goonetilleke's chosen writers was best placed-during his stay in South Asia-to move up and down through social and administrative levels of the English ruling class as well as...
In a general sense, my initial research has confirmed for me that all of the colonial empires were deeply aware of one another, and that they did not leave this awareness to casual links or to hearsay. Rather, most of the various national colonies maintained direct and sustained contact with one another through offices of consul-generals located in important imperial capitals. So, for example, the French appointed a consul-general to the Dutch East Indies as well as to India as an ambassador, mouth-piece, and intelligence collector. The consul-general, in turn, kept up a steady stream of correspondence with the Governor-General in Indochina, informing him of recent developments in the East Indies or India, communicating warnings based on experiences in the colony he was visiting, and serving as a liaison between nations. 2ff7e9595c
Comments